Ssd test

4GB. Each test was conducted upto 64MB I/O and we recorded the sequential performance and the IO/s:ATTO Disk Benchmark Test #1256MB File PEAK Read Throughput = 4.91GB/s256MB File PEAK Write Throughput = 4.62GB/sATTO Disk Benchmark Test #21GB File PEAK Read Throughput = 4.88GB/s1GB File PEAK Write Throughput = 4.62GB/sATTO Disk Benchmark Test #34GB File PEAK Read Throughput = 4.88GB/s4GB File PEAK Write Throughput = 4.49GB/sThe next test of the WD Black SN770 SSD involved CrystalDisk Benchmark and I tested a 1GB, 4GB and 16GB File scale.CRYSTALDISK MARK 1GB TESTCRYSTALDISK MARK 4GB TESTCRYSTALDISK MARK 16GB TESTNext, I switched to AS SSD benchmark. A much more thorough test through, I used 1GB, 3GB and 5GB test files. Each test includes throughput benchmarks and IOPS that are respective to the larger file sizes (important, if you are reading this and trying to compare against the reported 4K IOPS from the manufacturer).AS SSD Benchmark Test #1AS SSD Benchmark Test #2AS SSD Benchmark Test #3Ordinarily, I would introduce tests like BlackMagic and AJA into the mix here, but even a short burst of testing on an NVMe like this would over saturate the cache memory on board. Nevertheless, in the short term we still could ascertain the reported performance on 1GB, 4GB and 16GB file testing was:4GB AJA File Test Results (Peak) = 4,357MB/s Read & 4,711MB/s Write16GB AJA File Test Results (Peak) = 4,364MB/s Read & 4,715MB/s Write16GB AJA File Test Results (Peak) = 4,715MB/s Read & 4,371MB/s WriteThe overall performance throughout all testing largely exceeded the reported maximum by WD themselves, which I was very impressed by. Sustained performance was unsurprisingly poorer as the borrowed system memory and controller became overworking in the larger and longer-running tests, but in shorter bursts, the drive clearly did what they said it can do and more. Let’s conclude today’s review and work out what we think of the WD Black SN770 SSD.WD Black SN770 SSD Review – Conclusion & VerdictYou can not really fault the WD Black SN850 SSD in terms of what Western Digital has said this drive can do, as it not only meets those expectations consistently but also exceeds it more often than not by a few degrees. The WD Black SN850 SSD is not going to challenge the current generation of 7K performing drives, but then it is not trying to. This is a mid-range SSD that serves as an entry point into PCIe 4 storage for many and in that tier of storage, the WD Black SN770 SSD unquestionably succeeds. That said, this SSD is at this price and at this power efficiency by design and the fact it took WD this long to release a 2nd entry into their PCIe4

To rendering expectations, throughput, file read/write expectations for transfers and that kind of thing.Benchmark Results: The AJA System Test results showed the LaCie Rugged SSD 1TB external drive was capable of averaging 944 MB/s read and 878 MB/s write. The capture and playback was fairly smooth as performance as you can see in the performance over time charts shown in the results above.Benchmark Results: The LaCie Rugged SSD 1TB did really well on this benchmark as it is the fastest USB 3.1 Gen 2 portable SSD that we have ever tested!Blackmagic Disk Speed TestBlackmagic Design has a storage drive benchmarking tool that customers can use to test the speed of your disk performance for working with high quality video at different resolutions and codecs.Benchmark Results: The LaCie Rugged SSD 1TB drive topped out at around 942 MB/s read and 877 MB/s write on the Disk Speed Test by Blackmagic. The results show this drive will handle all 1080P and 2K content just fine, and most 4K content. The frames on 4K 10-bit YUV 4:2:2 video were 42 read and 39 write it didn’t receive a passing mark as a result, but 40 FPS is still workable for most. Article Contents LaCie Rugged SSD - Premium NVMe SSD The SSD Benchmark Test System CrystalDiskMark, AJA System Test, Blackmagic Disk Speed Test PCMark 10 Data Drive Benchmark Large File Transfer and Game Load Benchmarks Final Thoughts & Conclusions

CrystalDiskMark 3.0.1 Benchmark Source:AS SSD CrystalDiskMark is a drive benchmark tool which conducts a series of Sequential, 512K and 4K read and write tests. 100MB test 500MB test 1000MB test 2000MB test 4000MB test CrystalDiskMark 100MB Test 500MB Test 1,000MB Test 2,000MB Test 4,000MB Test Read Write Read Write Read Write Read Write Read Write Sequential (MB/s) : 196.9 173.5 189.3 182.3 199.3 186.8 197.3 184.5 199.0 185.8 512K (MB/s) : 151.9 33.45 152.8 26.9 153.9 24.32 151.3 24.40 150.4 23.47 4K (MB/s) : 15.01 5.33 14.01 6.4 14.41 10.2 14.22 10.13 14.01 10.14 4K QD32 (MB/s) : 12.77 5.28 11.38 4.4 11.03 4.95 10.99 3.75 10.84 3.12The SD Extreme 64GB USB 3.0 flash drive scores 196M/s Read & 173.5MB/s Write in the 100MB Sequential test of CrystalDiskMark.The test results peak at 199MB/s Read in the 1000MB and 4000MB tests. Write test results peak at 186.8MB/s in the 1000MB test. These results surpass SD's advertised capabilities for this 64GB USB 3.0 flash drive, which are based on the 100MB test result. AS SSD 1.6.4013 Benchmark Source:AS SSD The AS SSD benchmark determines the performance of Solid State Drives (SSD). The tool contains six synthetic and three copy tests. In AS SSD we see similarly quick results from the Sandisk Extreme 64GB USB 3.0 flash drive. It achieves a score of 179MB/s Read / 175MB/s Write in the sequential test. These results are in line with the manufacturers advertised capabilities. SiSoft Sandra 2012 - Removable Storage Source:Sandra Sandra is designed to test the theoretical power of a complete system and individual components. The numbers taken though are again, purely theoretical and may not represent real world performance. Higher numbers represent better performance. Sandra 2012 Removable Storage Read / Write Tests (MB/s) Cap. Data Interface 4 KB Test (MB/s) 64 KB Test (MB/s) 1MB Test(MB/s) 16MB Test(MB/s) 256MB Test(MB/s) Read Write Read Write Read Write Read Write Read Write SanDisk Extreme 64GB USB 3.0 5.72 2 88.38 61.28 165.88 158 169 33.08 188.4 159.83 Patriot Memory 64GB USB 3.0 5.82 0.233 53.33 3.24 67.5 15.81 96.34 18.56 122.39 45.76 Supertalent Luxio 64GB

By May 21, 2018 SanDisk Extreme Portable SSD Performance BenchmarksTo benchmark the SanDisk Extreme 1TB Portable SSD we’ll be using CrystalDiskMark, ATTO Disk Benchmark, Anvil’s Storage Utilities, AJA System Test, and a manual file transfer test. These five benchmarks should paint a good overall picture of how this portable SSD performs, so you know what kind of performance to expect before making a purchase that could be up to $630.SanDisk Extreme 1TB Portable SSD CrystalDiskMark: When it comes to sequential read/write performance we topped out at just shy of 560 MB/s read and right around 500 MB/s write on the 1TB model that we tested. Not bad and exceeds the series rated speeds of up to 550MB/s read speeds and up to 500 MB/s write speeds.SanDisk Extreme 1TB Portable SSD ATTO: ATTO Disk Benchmark showed that we were getting up to 562 MB/s read and 527 MB/s write speeds on the SanDisk 1TB Extreme Portable SSD through the USB 3.1 Type-C port on our Dell XPS 13 laptop.SanDisk Extreme 1TB Portable SSD Anvil: Anvil’s Storage Utilities benchmark finished with an overall score of 2,818.89 points on the SanDisk Extreme 1TB Portable SSD with no modifications to Windows 10. The sequential read speeds were 482 MB/s and the sequential write speeds were 443 MB/s. Random 4K read/write performance isn’t that important on a secondary drive, but some will likely try using this as a boot drive at some point in time. We are seeing 21/39 MB/s Random 4K read/write speeds on this portable drive, which is pretty solid.SanDisk Extreme 1TB Portable SSD AJA System Test: AJA System Test by AJA Video Systems measures system disk performance using video test files of different resolutions, sizes and codecs. We selected the standard 4K UltraHD resolution, a test file size of 1GB and the ProRes 4444 codec to see how this drive does with regard to video rendering performance. ProRes 4444 is used for heavy effects work and deep color projects. FPS is very important for this market as well as MB/s, so we’ll be talking about both FPS and MB/s performance here. The